The Court of Appeal in the case of Horton v Henry  EWCA Civ 989 had to consider that very question.
In this case, the respondent husband had made himself bankrupt on a bankruptcy application (petition) issued by him. A trustee in bankruptcy was appointed and the assets of the respondent husband on the date of the bankruptcy included four pensions from which the respondent could draw down a lump sum payment and or derive an income. The respondent elected not to do so and was supported by the reported generosity of his wife and then immediate family.
Ultimately, the day before then the respondent would have been discharged from his bankruptcy, the appellant filed an application for an income payments order requiring the respondent husband to pay (i) the tax-free lump sum that the respondent was entitled to draw down from the four pensions he had and (ii) a further payment of any monthly or periodic income that the respondent might have obtained from those pensions.
Lord Justice Gloster summarised the issue then before the Court of Appeal as follows:
“does a pension entitlement in respect of which a bankrupt has a present right to elect to draw down payment (but has not yet exercised) fall to be included in the assessment of his income“?
Upon consideration of the issue, the Court of Appeal held that such pension rights did not fall to be included as income. The following reasons were given:
- The Insolvency Act and pension legislation had explicitly excluded pension rights from the estate of a bankrupt. Parliament had decided to draw a balance between, on the one hand, the interests of the State in encouraging people to save for their retirement, and, on the other, the interests in creditors receiving payment of their debts.
- A trustee could not require a bankrupt to take steps to obtain property that was excluded from their estate, and convert it into income receivable by him, so that it could be subject to an income payments order. A trustee could not require a bankrupt to work so as to receive a salary, nor to request a payment from a discretionary trust of which he was a beneficiary.
- If a trustee were able to compel the bankrupt to draw on his pension, then the courts would have to decide both the amount and manner of the draw down. The absence of criteria in the Insolvency Act informing the court as to how it should make such a determination was a “formidable obstacle to the trustee’s arguments”.
- As a matter of construction of section 310 of the Insolvency Act, there was no basis for concluding that a bankrupt’s contractual rights to draw down or crystalise his pension come within the definition of “income of the bankrupt”.
- The Insolvency Act as well as the relevant provisions of the Pensions Act 1995 and the Welfare Reform and Pensions Act 1999, drew a clear distinction between rights under a pension scheme and payments under such a scheme.
In short, the Court of Appeal determined that a trustee in bankruptcy cannot compel a bankrupt to draw down payment from his pension entitlement, if he has not yet elected to do so. Such pension rights could not be included as part of the bankrupt’s in come.
At Prism Family Law, we offer all potential client’s the opportunity to meet with us for free and offer all a 30 minute initial appointment so that we can discuss your requirements and case such so as to allow us to advise you on all the available options open to you to choose from. If you find yourself in a position whereby either you or your partner are contemplating bankruptcy prior to or during separation then it is imperative that you seek advice at the earliest opportunity to determine what impact that may have on the family. We would strenuously advise all that may be impacted by the issues of this article to seek legal advice and help at the earliest opportunity.
Should you require the services of Prism Family Law for any family law related matter please do not hesitate to contact solicitor Andrew Wraith in the first instance.
Prism Family deliberately offer free initial consultations. You can call us on 0191 269 6871 or email us via email@example.com. You can also follow us on Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebook for the latest news and views on family law.